Should Government Fund Free Healthcare Through Taxes or Should Citizens Pay Themselves with Private Health Insurance?

Outline

Paragraph	Information to include
Paragraph 1: Introduction	Argument and theses statement. Example: government fund free healthcare through taxes is a good thing applied to the community because positive response from the public, it helped poor people gain access to health, and it concerned the technical criteria in hospital.
Paragraph 2: Argument 1 and Supporting evidence	Argument:  Government health insurance through taxes has greatly helped the poor to gain access to health. Supporting evidence: 1.      Sri Mulyani as Indonesia's finance minister, which was reported from Liputan 6, IDR 1 trillion is equal to 3.6 million poor people who have access to health. 2.      Research FEB UI states that the KIS program has saved 1.16 million poor people in 2016.
Paragraph 3: Argument 2 and Supporting evidence	Argument:  Good health services for people so that the level of community comfort is guaranteed then positive response of community satisfaction will be high. Supporting evidence: 1.      Like JKN or National Health Insurance) in 2016 JKN health service satisfaction rates were 78.6 percent. Said Fahmi Idris as the Director of BPJS, which was reported from Tribun news. 2.      The health facility satisfaction index reached 76.2 percent. Said Fahmi Idris as the Director of BPJS, which was reported from Tribun news.
Paragraph 4: Argument 3 and Supporting evidence	Argument: In Indonesia, the health insurance that the government goes through with taxes is also very concerned about the technical criteria in hospitals. Supporting evidence: 1.      In 2019 health insurance such as BPJS must cooperate with hospitals that have been accredited and there are technical criteria that are considered such as human resources (competent medical personnel), facilities and infrastructure and health service commitments said Fahmi as BPJS main director to CNN Indonesia.
Paragraph 5: Counter-Argument	Opposing argument: Many people think that free government health insurance through taxes does not have a health impact on the poor, service dissatisfaction and does not pay attention to quality in hospitals. Counter argument: But the truth is not like that if only health insurance had a negative impact, the government would certainly not allow that to happen, but it is true that the positive response from the community was 78.6 percent of health care in 2016 and also saved 1.16 million people poor in Indonesia.
Paragraph 6: Conclusion	So, government fund free healthcare through taxes is a good thing applied to the community, especially in Indonesia.

Health includes the most important part for humans. Without health, humans will not do all their activities effectively. With the existence of health insurance for the community, it is certainly welcomed by the community because it can make financing relief in the health sector. The role of the government in financing health through taxes is felt to be very effective for the community compared to paying with private health insurance and certainly will be welcomed by a positive response from the public, it helped poor people gain access to health, and it concerned the technical criteria in hospital.

Government health insurance through taxes has greatly helped the poor to gain access to health. According to Sri Mulyani as Indonesia's finance minister, which was reported from Liputan 6, IDR 1 trillion is equal to 3.6 million poor people who have access to health. Then, for the Java region alone, it has donated taxes worth 737.6 trillion in the form of PPh and PPN. For example KSI or Indonesian Health Card. Research FEB UI states that the KIS program has saved 1.16 million poor people in 2016.

Good health services for people so that the level of community comfort is guaranteed then the positive response to community satisfaction will be high. Like JKN or National Health Insurance) in 2016 JKN health service satisfaction rates were 78.6 percent. The health facility satisfaction index reached 76.2 percent. It was strengthened again by the words of Fahmi Idris as the Director of BPJS, improving health services to the public despite the high number of participants and the high number of diseases handled.

In Indonesia, the health insurance that the government goes through with taxes is also very concerned about the technical criteria in hospitals. According to Nila Farid Moeloek as health minister and BPJS President Director Fahmi Idris agreed to extend cooperation with accredited or non-accredited hospitals. This means that health insurance participants in the form of KIS can still enjoy services at the hospital must not be accredited. However, in 2019 health insurance such as BPJS must cooperate with hospitals that have been accredited and there are technical criteria that are considered such as human resources (competent medical personnel), facilities and infrastructure and health service commitments said Fahmi as BPJS main director to CNN Indonesia.

Many people think that free government health insurance through taxes does not have a health impact on the poor, service dissatisfaction and does not pay attention to quality in hospitals. But the truth is not like that if only health insurance had a negative impact, the government would certainly not allow that to happen, but it is true that the positive response from the community was 78.6 percent of health care in 2016 and also saved 1.16 million people poor in Indonesia. 

So, government fund free healthcare through taxes is a good thing applied to the community, especially in Indonesia. With the existence of good evidence and track history from previous events, such as KIS and BPJS give real, free contributions, positive responses from the community and pay attention to the quality of health standards for the community.